"and they became a sign"

Today's post will outline an interesting new idea I recently had about this promise in Isaiah:

26 ¶ And he will lift up an ensign to the nations from far, and will hiss unto them from the end of the earth... (Isaiah 5)

I've always thought of this "ensign" as a positive thing -- a banner or a beacon to which the honest in heart will flock. And I still think that is a perfectly valid way to think about this verse.

What I offer below is an alternative suggestion for what this "ensign" might be. In this post, every time you see a word highlighted in blue, it comes from the same Hebrew root.

The company of Korah

In the book of Numbers, we read about a challenge to the authority of Moses and Aaron.  Descendants of Reuben (the eldest son of Jacob) dispute over who should have the right to lead the people.

Moses prevails in a pretty miraculous way, and then we read this:

10 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign. (Numbers 26)

The NRSV translates this word as "warning." Although I'm only a novice when it comes to Hebrew, I get curious as I read the Old Testament about what the original Hebrew words are for certain phrases. I read this and really wanted to know what word was translated into "sign" in this verse. Here is is:

nes (נֵס): a standard, ensign, signal, sign

This same word is used to describe the brazen serpent that Moses raises in the wilderness to heal the people from the fiery serpents (see Numbers 21:8-9).

Isaiah uses the word several times in a similar context as the verse quoted above from Isaiah 5.  A few key examples are presented below:

Isaiah 11

10 ¶ And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.

11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.

12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

Interestingly, Doctrine & Covenants 113:3-4 seems to indicate that the "root of Jesse" is Joseph Smith. Furthermore, in verse 11, flanked by two references to the latter-day "ensign for the nations," we get the prophecy that the Lord "shall set his hand again to recover the remnant of his people." The Hebrew of this phrase includes yō·w·sîp̄, from which the name Joseph derives. Very interesting and clever, if you ask me.

Isaiah 13

2 Lift ye up a banner upon the high mountain, exalt the voice unto them, shake the hand, that they may go into the gates of the nobles.

This verse is also very interesting.  It's presented in a clear military context.  Bible commentaries outline how this verse essentially describes the Lord declaring war on Babylon and calling His people to gather to the standard to prepare for the coming war.

Isaiah 18

3 All ye inhabitants of the world, and dwellers on the earth, see ye, when he lifteth up an ensign on the mountains; and when he bloweth a trumpet, hear ye.

In this verse we see much of the same imagery as in Isaiah 13:2, with the addition of the trumpet.  I'll get to that symbol as I attempt to tie all of these symbols together below.

Connecting to the Book of Mormon

With all of this in mind, what is the latter-day 'ensign' spoken of in these verses? I can't help but see the Book of Mormon itself as the best fit.  Of course it connects to the restoration of the Gospel, the priesthood, the temple, covenants, etc.  But the Book of Mormon itself is the voice of warning to the world. What better way to warn than to give us the record of a civilization of Israelites who collapsed as a result of rejecting the covenant? The voice of warning "[cries] from the dust" (2 Nephi 33:13) and admonishes us to "give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been." (Mormon 9:31).

Moroni, the same being who is depicted with a trumpet on so many of our temples, sounds this voice of warning to the world and reminds us that the coming forth of the Book of Mormon is the sign that the Lord has set His hand again to recover the remnant of his people.

16 ... Remember, when ye see these things, ye shall know that the time is at hand that they shall be made manifest in very deed.

17 Therefore, when ye shall receive this record ye may know that the work of the Father has commenced upon all the face of the land. (Ether 4)

The company of Korah "became a sign" for the ancient Israelites to remember by what power they had been delivered from Egypt.  Similarly, the Nephites have become a sign for us in the latter days to remember that the way of life comes through hearkening the voice of the Lord.

"But the spirit of the Lord took possession of Gideon"

The heading is a phrase from Judges 6:34, NSRV translation. The Hebrew word that has been translated into "took possession" is labash and means to put on, wear, clothe or be clothed. In other words, the Spirit is wearing Gideon. The NRSV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible comments on this verse:

According to the normal use of this form of this Hebrew verb (“to clothe”), the Hebrew reads “the Spirit of the LORD put on Gideon,” suggesting that the Spirit “wears” Gideon, i.e., the Spirit is inside him, rather than Gideon “wearing” the Spirit, as an external force. This raises the question whether the Spirit functions as an internal or external force. 

The question about the Spirit functioning as an internal or external force is worth pondering. Especially considering the fact that there are other passages of scripture describing the Spirit of the Lord coming or rushing upon someone. There are multiple examples of that also in the book of Judges, like 3:10, 11:29, 14:6 and 15:14. In these examples, the spirit is portrayed as more of an external force. There are also other scriptures using the labash or the clothing metaphor to describe righteous people enwrapped in the divine, which is the opposite of what happens with Gideon. Clothed in glory or in the robe of righteousness, etc. is a topic that has been discussed frequently on this blog. See for instance this post with links to related posts. These examples would describe the spirit as more of an external force, so Judges 6:34 creates an interesting twist. Like Gideon, we can become worthy of becoming the clothing of the spirit, something that he feels comfortable wearing!

The phrase from Judges 6:34 is almost unique in the Old Testament. I found one other example.

And the Spirit of God came upon Zechariah the son of Jehoiada the priest, which stood above the people, and said unto them, Thus saith God, Why transgress ye the commandments of the Lord, that ye cannot prosper? because ye have forsaken the Lord, he hath also forsaken you. (2 Chronicles 24:20)

In the KJV it has been translated as "came upon", in the NSRV it is "took possession of" like in Judges, but the underlying Hebrew is labesh so a more accurate translation would be that the Spirit of God put on Zechariah. The idea of the Spirit inside of us instead of upon us is not unique in these two verses in 2 Chronicles and Judges, though. But it is usually portrayed as the Spirit dwelling in us rather than wearing us. 

And they saw that they had become weak, like unto their brethren, the Lamanites, and that the Spirit of the Lord did no more preserve them; yea, it had withdrawn from them because the Spirit of the Lord doth not dwell in unholy temples (Helaman 4:24)

The difference between our bodies/temples and clothes are not as big as we might think, not to the ancient Israelite mind. For instance, in Job 10:11, Job says that God has clothed (Hebr. labash) him in skin and flesh, i.e. given him a mortal body. There was a symbolic connection between your body, your clothes and your dwelling place. The Savior was sometimes described as dwelling in a tabernacle, meaning his mortal body. Also, Levite priests wore special garments when entering into the ancient tabernacle that were made of the same fabric as the tabernacle itself. They were also changed when the priest moved from the holy place into the holy of holies, emulating the different fabrics of the tabernacle. 

Back to the question about the Spirit as an internal or external force. The obvious answer is both. 

43 And it came to pass that when they cast their eyes about, and saw that the cloud of darkness was dispersed from overshadowing them, behold, they saw that they were encircled about, yea every soul, by a pillar of fire.

44 And Nephi and Lehi were in the midst of them; yea, they were encircled about; yea, they were as if in the midst of a flaming fire, yet it did harm them not, neither did it take hold upon the walls of the prison; and they were filled with that joy which is unspeakable and full of glory.

45 And behold, the Holy Spirit of God did come down from heaven, and did enter into their hearts, and they were filled as if with fire, and they could speak forth marvelous words. (Helaman 5)

In this example the fire was encircling them from the outside and filling them inside. A similar example from D&C including both "round about" and "in your hearts".

And whoso receiveth you, there I will be also, for I will go before your face. I will be on your right hand and on your left, and my Spirit shall be in your hearts, and mine angels round about you, to bear you up. (D&C 84:88)

 

Thoughts on Joseph, part 2

My last post was about Joseph and how the prophecies about the arc of the House of Israel map pretty cleanly onto the story of Joseph and his brothers.

In today's post, I'd like to go into some depth on the nature of Joseph's famous "coat of many colors." We'll talk about how it probably wasn't a "coat of many colors" and what it symbolizes.  We'll also talk about how the coat/garment is a very ancient symbol that can teach us quite a lot about Jesus Christ -- what He's done for us since before the foundation of the world, and how we go about binding ourselves to Him.

The Coat of Many Colors -- (Hebrew 'ketonet passim')

I don't know about you, but just hearing that phrase conjures an image of Donny Osmond on Broadway in my mind.

 

However, the translation of the Hebrew 'ketonet passim' suggests that we should probably think about this coat a little bit differently:

The familiar rendering “a coat of many colours” … is certainly incorrect. It is literally “a tunic of palms,” i.e. reaching to the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet, differing from an ordinary tunic by having sleeves, and by reaching to the feet. The same word is used in 2 Samuel 13:18 of a dress worn by a princess … (Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, my emphasis added)

And he made him פּסּים כּתנת: a long coat with sleeves …, i.e., an upper coat reaching to the wrists and ankles, such as noblemen and kings' daughters wore, not "a coat of many colours"  (Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament, my emphasis added)

Although some scholars favor an interpretation that the coat was actually a patchwork of different fabrics passed down since Adam, I think it's most helpful if we think of Joseph's coat as a symbol of nobility or favored status.  He wore a garment suitable for a royal court, not the clothing of a laborer in the field.

A Symbol of the Knowledge of Divine Heritage

I don't know how Joseph felt about his coat, but when I think about his coat, I liken it to a knowledge of my divine heritage.  We are strangers here in mortality, gifted with a deep sense that we belong to something much grander than this fallen world. The coat is the symbol of this.

To expound on this point, I could go into tremendous detail about all the various ways this coat symbolizes elements of the grand design of God and our role in that design. Instead, in an effort to keep this post from becoming book-length, I'll limit my focus to just two key points, both of which can best be understood in the context of the clothing worn by the high priest of Israel:

Make sacred garments for your brother Aaron, to give him dignity and honor (Exodus 28:2)

If you have difficulty connecting Joseph's coat to the temple, consider the Israelite High Priest's attire, which is described in exquisite detail in the Old Testament. This clothing included:

• White linen undergarments (a symbol of holiness, discussed in more detail below)
• A blue cloth robe (colored with a very expensive dye and woven to resemble a coat of mail). The robe had cloth pomegranates and golden bells along the bottom.
• An ephod (waistband and golden chains running over the shoulders). The chains held stones over the priest's shoulder containing the names of the twelve tribes.
• A breastplate with pouches for the Urim and Thummim.
• A turban with a golden plate upon which was inscribed the words: "Holiness to the Lord."

(An excellent source summarizing the priestly clothing is found here.)

The connection seems pretty clear to me. Like so many other aspects of the covenant, the symbolism of the sacred clothing flows two ways -- from God to man and from man to God.

1. In the sense that it is given by God to those with whom He covenants, the coat is a symbol of God's promises to the faithful.

Here are a few thoughts of mine about this first point.

• God promises great things to those who love Him -- things which cannot be discerned by the natural senses. The ornate coat is a symbol of this.
• God made coats of skins for Adam and Eve as they were being expelled from the Garden of Eden. The skins must have come from somewhere.  The association of the coats of skin with the principle of sacrifice is undeniable.
• Many centuries later, the symbol of the coat as a token of the covenant between God and His covenant people remained deeply engrained in Nephite culture. Alma 46 is a great example of this (see this post for more details).

2. In the sense that it is worn by faithful covenant keepers as a sign of their fidelity to that covenant, the coat is a symbol of a person's devotion to God.

The royal clothing is a reminder that we are 'strangers and pilgrims' on the earth. We don't belong here and this isn't our final destination. Paul teaches this beautifully when he teaches about the faith of Abraham and Sarah:

13 All these people died in faith without receiving the promises, but they saw the promises from a distance and welcomed them. They confessed that they were strangers and immigrants on earth. 14 People who say this kind of thing make it clear that they are looking for a homeland. 15 If they had been thinking about the country that they had left, they would have had the opportunity to return to it. 16 But at this point in time, they are longing for a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore, God isn’t ashamed to be called their God—he has prepared a city for them. (Hebrews 11, CEB)

I think of this royal clothing as an outward sign that a person is seeking the "heavenly country" that God has prepared those who will have Him to be their God.

Those who embrace their covenant with God understand it as a promise of protection.  It's literally a covering from destruction and other curses.  The Hebrew word for atonement is 'kafar,' which has reference to a covering or a close embrace.  Hugh Nibley explains:

The basic word for atonement is kafar, which has the same basic meaning in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic—that being “to bend, arch over, cover; 2) [to pass over with one’s palm &c., to wipe out, rub] … to deny, … to forgive, … to be expiated, … renounce.”  The Arabic kafara puts the emphasis on a tight squeeze, such as tucking in the skirts, drawing a thing close to oneself. Closely related are Aramaic and Arabic kafata, meaning a close embrace, which are certainly related to the Egyptian hpt, the common ritual embrace written with the ideogram of embracing arms. Hpt may be cognate with the Latin capto and the Persian kaftan, a monk’s robe and hood completely embracing the body.  ... Most interesting is the Arabic kafata, as it is the key to a dramatic situation. It was the custom for one fleeing for his life in the desert to seek protection in the tent of a great sheik, crying out, “Ana dakhiluka,” meaning “I am thy suppliant,” whereupon the host would place the hem of his robe over the guest’s shoulder and declare him under his protection...In reply, according to the ancient custom, the Master would then place the hem of his robe protectively over the kneeling man’s shoulder (kafata). This puts him under the Lord’s protection from all enemies. They embrace in a close hug, as Arab chiefs still do; the Lord makes a place for him and invites him to sit down beside him—they are at-one. (source)

We'll end this post with the poetic words of Nephi, who encapsulates the beauty of the symbol of the heavenly garment and the protection and promise it offers:

O Lord, wilt thou encircle me around in the robe of thy righteousness! O Lord, wilt thou make a way for mine escape before mine enemies! (2 Nephi 4:33)

"A scourge on your sides"

As noted before, for instance in my recent posts on inheritance (Hebr. yeresh), there are several parallels between the Old Testament exodus and entry into the promised land and the Book of Mormon. Here is another one:

Know assuredly that the LORD your God will not continue to drive out these nations before you; but they shall be a snare and a trap for you, a scourge on your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until you perish from this good land that the LORD your God has given you. (Joshua 23:13, NRSV)

The context of this verse is a warning of what will happen if Israel stray from the covenant and worship the idols of other nations. The other nations around the promised land would be scourges for Israel. Nephi uses the same metaphor when prophesying about the Jews

15 Wherefore, the Jews shall be scattered among all nations; yea, and also Babylon shall be destroyed; wherefore, the Jews shall be scattered by other nations.

16 And after they have been scattered, and the Lord God hath scourged them by other nations for the space of many generations, yea, even down from generation to generation until they shall be persuaded to believe in Christ, the Son of God, and the atonement, which is infinite for all mankind (2 Nephi 25)

The scourging of Israel by other nations in Palestine is paralleled by the scourging of a branch of Israel in the Americas. Compare with these Book of Mormon verses:

And if it so be that they rebel against me, they shall be a scourge unto thy seed, to stir them up in the ways of remembrance. (1 Nephi 2:24)

And the Lord God said unto me: They shall be a scourge unto thy seed, to stir them up in remembrance of me; and inasmuch as they will not remember me, and hearken unto my words, they shall scourge them even unto destruction. (2 Nephi 5:25)

But, wo, wo, unto you that are not pure in heart, that are filthy this day before God; for except ye repent the land is cursed for your sakes; and the Lamanites, which are not filthy like unto you, nevertheless they are cursed with a sore cursing, shall scourge you even unto destruction. (Jacob 3:3)

Although not seen directly in the first two verses, we know from the context that "they" refer to the Lamanites. Just like the nations around Israel were a scourge to them, the Lamanites act in a similar role as a scourge to the Nephites. The interesting part is that God seems to deliberately set it up that way. To Joshua he clearly states that he will not drive out the other nations before Israel. They shall remain there as a scourge. Granted, this is the consequence of their sins, but Nephi expands on what seems like a divine plan. When "the Lord God hath scourged them by other nations" they will eventually be persuaded to believe in Christ. 

Similarly, God deliberately sets up the Lamanites as a scourge to the Nephites. This has at least two purposes, according to 2 Nephi 5:25: To stir them up to remembrance or to destroy if they are stirred up and still don't hearken. This is something we recognize from the Old Testament as well and the conditions for the land of inheritance. Either you must remember and hearken unto God or be destroyed. Living in the promised land in sin is not an option, at least not in the long term.

This shows how God creates a branch of Israel in a new promised land with the same conditions as their forefathers. The pattern also repeats later as prophesied by the Savior himself

27 And after that ye were blessed then fulfilleth the Father the covenant which he made with Abraham, saying: In thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed—unto the pouring out of the Holy Ghost through me upon the Gentiles, which blessing upon the Gentiles shall make them mighty above all, unto the scattering of my people, O house of Israel.

28 And they shall be a scourge unto the people of this land. Nevertheless, when they shall have received the fulness of my gospel, then if they shall harden their hearts against me I will return their iniquities upon their own heads, saith the Father.

29 And I will remember the covenant which I have made with my people; and I have covenanted with them that I would gather them together in mine own due time, that I would give unto them again the land of their fathers for their inheritance, which is the land of Jerusalem, which is the promised land unto them forever, saith the Father. (3 Nephi 20)

The Gentile nations around Israel being a scourge to them, repeats in the latter days. History repeats itself. Scribes after ancient Israelite tradition held a worldview where time ran in cycles and God's dealings with his children followed established recurring patterns. The ancient rabbis highlighted the repeating elements in biblical narrative, noting that “what happens to the fathers, happens to the sons.” The Book of Mormon seems to follow this pattern. 

We also see from the last quote how the scourge links to the Abrahamic covenant and lands of inheritance. Promised lands are a blessing of the Abrahamic covenant, granted as an inheritance (Hebr. yeresh) to God's covenant people. But it needs to be kept undefiled, either by stirring the covenant people to repentance or destroying the unrepentant people. The scourge serves both functions.

Land of our inheritance -- Part 2

In Part 1 we looked at the covenant connection of the Hebrew yeresh, meaning to inherit/possess. The promised land is an inheritance given by covenant. It is a blessing ("flowing with milk and honey") but also a great responsibility. 

9 And now, we can behold the decrees of God concerning this land, that it is a land of promise; and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall serve God, or they shall be swept off when the fulness of his wrath shall come upon them. And the fulness of his wrath cometh upon them when they are ripened in iniquity.

10 For behold, this is a land which is choice above all other lands; wherefore he that doth possess it shall serve God or shall be swept off; for it is the everlasting decree of God. And it is not until the fulness of iniquity among the children of the land, that they are swept off. (Ether 2)

In Deuteronomy, Israel are repeatedly instructed to purge the evil out of their midst when they possess the promised land. The evil that should be purged comes from breaking God's statutes, judgments and commandments. Sin made unclean and defiled the whole land.

As we have often seen from Old Testament rhetoric, the blessings and cursings associated with the promised land were temporal and physical in nature. It was all about crop yields, weather, success or failure in warfare, children and posterity. There was little concern with the afterlife. But then the Book of Mormon comes along and adds a spiritual dimension to it all, indicating that the Old Testament instructions and events also functioned as "a type and a shadow" (Mosiah 13:10). For instance, in 1 Nephi 15, Nephi teaches his brothers about the Abrahamic covenant and the restoration of the Jews and ties it into his and his father's vision of the tree of life. His brothers seem confused about the temporal and spiritual aspects of this.

31 And they said unto me: Doth this thing mean the torment of the body in the days of probation, or doth it mean the final state of the soul after the death of the temporal body, or doth it speak of the things which are temporal?

32 And it came to pass that I said unto them that it was a representation of things both temporal and spiritual; for the day should come that they must be judged of their works, yea, even the works which were done by the temporal body in their days of probation.

33 Wherefore, if they should die in their wickedness they must be cast off also, as to the things which are spiritual, which are pertaining to righteousness; wherefore, they must be brought to stand before God, to be judged of their works; and if their works have been filthiness they must needs be filthy; and if they be filthy it must needs be that they cannot dwell in the kingdom of God; if so, the kingdom of God must be filthy also.

34 But behold, I say unto you, the kingdom of God is not filthy, and there cannot any unclean thing enter into the kingdom of God; wherefore there must needs be a place of filthiness prepared for that which is filthy. (1 Nephi 15)

The temporal promised land of inheritance for Israel should be kept clean, otherwise God could not dwell there among them. This is a type and a shadow of our eternal inheritance. No unclean thing can enter in there, because then "the kingdom of God must be filthy also". Another example from Alma 40:26

But behold, an awful death cometh upon the wicked; for they die as to things pertaining to things of righteousness; for they are unclean, and no unclean thing can inherit the kingdom of God;

The bolded phrase is recurrent in the scriptures, especially the idea that the kingdom of God is an inheritance, like the promised land was to Israel. But Laman and Lemuel's confusion about the physical and spiritual dimension of this may be the reason for their statement in 1 Nephi 2:11

11 Now this he spake because of the stiffneckedness of Laman and Lemuel; for behold they did murmur in many things against their father, because he was a visionary man, and had led them out of the land of Jerusalem, to leave the land of their inheritance, and their gold, and their silver, and their precious things, to perish in the wilderness. And this they said he had done because of the foolish imaginations of his heart.

1 Nephi 17:21

Behold, these many years we have suffered in the wilderness, which time we might have enjoyed our possessions and the land of our inheritance; yea, and we might have been happy.

Learning about the covenant context of yeresh (possess/inherit), I realize that Laman and Lemuel's lament here is also an appeal to the Abrahamic covenant. Their land of inheritance was according to their tribe, Manasseh, granted as a covenant promise from God. They had gold, silver and other possessions, indicating covenant blessings in the land. So why should they leave it? This seems like a fair argument but they are missing the bigger point that Nephi explains. He launches into a long speech in 1 Nephi 17 after their comment that I will not quote. But the point is that God establishes different lands of promise for the righteous. "he leadeth away the righteous into precious lands, and the wicked he destroyeth" (1 Nephi 17:38). 

This is a common theme in the Book of Mormon. Lehi leaves the land of his inheritance in 1 Nephi 2 and arrives at the promised land, later described by Book of Mormon prophets as the land of their first inheritance. Then history repeats itself. The Nephites become wicked for the most part and Mosiah-I leads a small group out of that land that the Lamanites take over, as prophesied by Jacob

And the time speedily cometh, that except ye repent they shall possess the land of your inheritance, and the Lord God will lead away the righteous out from among you. (Jacob 3:4)

Later, the sons of Mosiah-II go back to "the place of their father's first inheritance" (Alma 22:28) to preach the gospel. They have great success, but their coverts are under serious threat by the wicked and must once again be led out of the land into a new land of inheritance. The Nephites come to the rescue and grant the Lamanite converts the land of Jershon, meaning "place of inheritance/possession" according to rules of Hebrew name formation. The 'Y' in yeresh becomes 'J' according to typical English transliteration of Hebrew, and the suffix, "on", indicates a place. The wordplay is evident

And it came to pass that the voice of the people came, saying: Behold, we will give up the land of Jershon, which is on the east by the sea, which joins the land Bountiful, which is on the south of the land Bountiful; and this land Jershon is the land which we will give unto our brethren for an inheritance...And now behold, this will we do unto our brethren, that they may inherit the land Jershon...And it came to pass that it did cause great joy among them. And they went down into the land of Jershon, and took possession of the land of Jershon (Alma 27:22, 24, 26)

According to Matthew Bowen, the land grants to the Lamanite converts therefore stand as a symbol of the restoration of the Abrahamic covenant and reintegration into the House of Israel. His most recent article in the Interpreter Journal touches upon several of the aspects in these two posts as well as some that I have not addressed.

The Book of Mormon is also full of promises about lands of inheritance in the latter days. For example

7 But behold, thus saith the Lord God: When the day cometh that they shall believe in me, that I am Christ, then have I covenanted with their fathers that they shall be restored in the flesh, upon the earth, unto the lands of their inheritance.

8 And it shall come to pass that they shall be gathered in from their long dispersion, from the isles of the sea, and from the four parts of the earth; and the nations of the Gentiles shall be great in the eyes of me, saith God, in carrying them forth to the lands of their inheritance.

9 Yea, the kings of the Gentiles shall be nursing fathers unto them, and their queens shall become nursing mothers; wherefore, the promises of the Lord are great unto the Gentiles, for he hath spoken it, and who can dispute?

10 But behold, this land, said God, shall be a land of thine inheritance, and the Gentiles shall be blessed upon the land. (2 Nephi 10)

As covenant children of Abraham, we are part of the restoration of the latter days where, according to the Book of Mormon, the righteous inherit their original promised lands, preparing for a time when we may inherit a place at the right hand of God (see Alma 5:58).